The people at Hungtington then showed us how they were going to fix this issue with our son and I
remember instantly recognizing the material as soon as they placed it on the table. It was an "SRA Reading Lab" packet. I used this when I was in elementary school from 3rd to 8th grade. These were "bite-sized" articles that a kids can read in a few minutes and answer 10 questions on what they read. These were not stories about witches and warlocks or teenagers turning into werewolves, but instead about a broad range of topics covering history, society or science. Huntington taught my son "HOW to read" an article for information. They taught him to:
- Read the first and last paragraph first (this will tell you what the article is about and where the author is taking you)
- Read the bold-face heading of the article (this will show you the stopping off points)
- Read the first/last sentence of every paragraph and any sentence that has a number in it (this could be a date or a value)
- Finally read the whole article in detail.
Read for pleasure vs Read for information
First of all, I don't want to knock novel-reading totally. If it gets a kid to read and insure he is literate then I am all for it. But much of our testing in schools today only seem to focus on this one area. For a large percentage of us, informational-reading will be a required ability in our jobs (unless your a book editor looking for the next Hemingway). Reading for information has been shown to use different areas in the brain than when we read a novel. Novels excite areas in the brain requiring imagination and visualization whereas informational reading exercises memory and critical thinking. We need help our kids develop this ability for them to be successful. Whether it's reading a stock report, a university study, a study on a new drug, a customer claim, a legal document, a report on product results.. the list goes on and on.
Some suggestions for parents: (things I wish I had done with my kids more)
- Use encyclopedias at home - I know in the days of Wikipedia this seems old fashioned but its not. Wikipedia is written for adults (academia mostly) and not for children. Also, it allows you to cover multiple topics at the same time and cross reference them. (I still believe the printed word is superior to a computer screen in this manner). Point them to them when they have questions (even better sit down with them and read it together). While NEW encyclopedia sets can be expensive, you can often purchased used sets for much less money (I found a 1980 set for $40 on Criagslist) and they are still good sources of information for kids in elementary/high school.
- Use SRA reading labs at home - you can purchase used sets from Amazon for about $400-$800. While this seems a bit pricy, the value they provide is very well worth the cost. These articles are written for their age group and are lengthy enough to challenge them without tiring them out. If your teacher's classroom has these already but they don't have time to utilize them in class, ask if your child can bring a few home over the weekend for them to do. (if you are on good terms with your teacher you may even ask if your child can use them over the summer).
- Teach them the above steps on how to read for information. Don't wait until they are in high school or college to develop this. It is an ability that takes time and repetition to develop in order to get good at.
- Have them read newspaper/magazine articles - When they are older have them read articles out of a newspaper or magazine after YOU have read the article. Prepare 3-4 questions from the article for them to answer (who, what, where type that they can easily answer if they read it ... not looking to "trip them up").
- Resist the temptation to let your kids read series novels. While these books are often popular (and most kids want to follow the group) series-novels, like "Harry Potter", are shown to be less
effectual than reading non-series novels. The reason being is simple. Series-novels do not expand our children's vocabulary as effectively and by the second
book most kids can follow the writer's story without reading 100% of the
text provided. They know the characters fairly well and the author's
style of writing so well that they can skip much of the written text to
find out what happens in the story. Another reason that books like Harry Potter are less effective is namely that the movie has ruined our kids need for imagination in that they no longer visualize the characters in the book as they see them. Instead they see the characters and scenery as Hollywood has provided on the screen (and even sometimes an altered/shortened story plot). You should try to keep them challenged by supplying them with new novels/books by different authors who have not yet had their stories retold by a movie producer.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.